Dark field microscopy

Dark field diagnostics is a particular type of diagnosis where a small drop of capillary blood is extracted from the patient’s finger. The blood can be looked at under a dark field microscope over a longer period of time. The microscope possesses a special condenser that makes everything visible which is in the blood – without blurring particles, substances, funges, viruses etc. and without colouring the cells. With a dark field microscope we can look at the micro cosmos of the blood. Thus, one can observe otherwise invisible phenomena which allow a conclusion to be drawn about existing diseases and susceptibilities to diseases which may manifest themselves in the future.

Dark field microscopy of living blood

Just like it was usual to examine body fluids of ill people in the antiquity, it is still a common practice nowadays. Just like the sentence “I KNOW THAT I DO NOT KNOW ANYTHING” still rushes on ahead of the fascinating technical progress and has thus maintained its validity, it is with many medical examinations which permit a wide range of interpretations and scare and make a suffering and intimidated person submit.

Up until 20 years ago when slipped discs had to be detected with injections of contrast mediums into the spinal cord nobody knew that around 60% of the healthy population, free of pain, had slipped discs which were so bad that they should have been operated immediately in the case of segmental problems. It means that one has to relativize the results before making an obligatory statement. In that case you could call nearly every back pain a slipped disc.

It is the same with many examinations of the blood: a check in the laboratory with 50 different parameters can have completely normal values and still the patient is seriously ill – because much was not examined, much was not taken into consideration and much cannot be examined, since the so-called progress is not advanced enough after all. HERE AND NOW one has to contemplate many things like a mosaic and in an unbiased way, following the symptoms and with the help of one’s own clinical experience and the technical possibilities. Dark field microscopy is such a piece of a mosaic.

For more than 100 years the most popular body fluid, the blood, is examined. Not only macroscopically, i.e. with bare eyes – though one can see much: if the colour and the consistency are very greasy, it is an indication of lipopathy, if it has the colour of a mature red wine or a rosé, it is an indication of completely different diseases which should be clarified with modern laboratory methods. Microscopically, the French Prof. Dr. Dr.  Pierre Bechamp found in the 1860s small micro organisms in all cells which can develop in bacteria, and drew the conclusion that diseases have their origin inside the body. More or less at the same time Virchow postulated the so-called cellular pathology which sees the cause of a disease in a disturbance of a single cell, like Pasteur who attributed respective micro organisms as a cause to all diseases. Prof. Claude Bernard, a contemporary of Bechamp, agreed with both finding that THE MICROBE IS NOTHING – THE ENVIRONMENT IS EVERYTHING. He was the first famous scientist who correlated environmental problems (which exist in the micro cosmos and in the macro cosmos) with causes of a disease.

From today’s point of view he had to be right, which however, 150 years after this terse observation found little expression in our medical world view. The nutrition, the significance of which is not sufficiently acknowledged in the education of doctors, also belongs to the environment and the inner world. What the patients get in most hospitals serves as a prove – but it is not good for recovery. Within certain limits and after consultation it is therefore recommended to „feed“ additionally, as it is a tradition in all developing countries.

Nowadays, dark field microscopy is a good help during the assessment and control of the course of diseases. Even if somebody has a critical attitude towards this method, it serves as an important diagnosis which can be confirmed with „accepted“ examinations in the laboratory. One can see environmental changes, overacidifications, clotting disturbances, lacks of oxygen, organic disorders, bacterial and parasitic burden and so on. Therefore, it is a valuable diagnosis additionally to the common examinations in the laboratory: one can see things which one cannot see otherwise and from which one can draw therapeutic conclusions.

It is not a so-called “orthodox medicine” that cost bearers refer to whenever they do not want to reimburse the costs – also and especially where the established medicine was not satisfactory for the patient. But it cannot be the task of the doctor not to carry out from which he expects a better effect, just because officials or experts are paid for refusing the reimbursement with reference to a „treatment with orthodox medicine“. This is the case when a treatment is expected from a patient taking into consideration irrevocable damage. It contradicts our humanitarian fundamental rights and the common dispensation of justice of first instance. In the case of resistance to an orthodox-medicine therapy there is an extra-statutory necessity which annuls the common dispensation of justice. Also the constitutional court looks at it in the same way – according to the principle: imagine it is war and nobody participates!

The fresh dark field

In the past century the German scientist Günther Enderlein (1872 – 1968) continued this work. He developed medicine (so-called nosodes) on the basis of the insights into the dark field which are still prescribed following the dark field results.
Enderlein then represented the insight that we form a symbiotic relationship with so-called archaebacteria; they were the first unicellular living things that had a metabolism that needed carbohydrates (sugar) and no oxygen for the generation of energy. The development from the unicellular organism to the pluricellular organism needed a more economical generation of energy which was only possible with oxygen and sugar. The unicellular organisms turned into mitochondria which partly still present characteristics of metabolism of these archaebacteria. Mitochondria are the power stations in the cell. Therefore, they are relics from the first bacteria which in case of malfunction can develop into bacteria that make one ill. As much to the observations of the mentioned researchers.

The case of malfunction: it is defined by „environmental changes“: malnutrition, stress, medicine, electrosmog, changes of the pH in the tissue, hormonal deficits and so on. These (internal) environmental changes require a recollection of stored „generation-of-energy programs“ for the cell, since the mitochondria cannot use the oxygen in the usual way (the mitochondria are limited in number and size in the case of many chronic diseases). The cells adjust to the archaic consumption of glucose without the help of oxygen and thus offer a fertile terrain for the growth of pathogens. This is roughly the mechanism of chronic diseases.
From a scientific point of view it can be proved and offers therefore a working array in order to treat diseases not only symptomatically, but more in a causal or regulatory way.
The following from the routine medicine serves as an example for these arguments – which may appear simple for some people:

The PET is used for the control of the course of cancer diseases. The patient is injected with radioactively marked glucose in order to find out where it accumulates. It accumulates where the hunger for sugar is highest – in the cancer cells. A cancer cell has a 30 times higher consumption of sugar than a healthy cell, since it cannot exploit the oxygen properly. Moreover, examinations show that the oxygen partial pressure is lower in chronically inflamed tissue. I.e. chronic inflammations pave the way for many other diseases including cancer, because they prepare the „inner environment“ for it. A British study with 48000 men between 40 and 75 years revealed that the danger of getting cancer increased by 30%, if they had inflammations in the area of the teeth or the jaw bone, for certain organs by 50%. This coincides with my observation that most people with tumour carry between four and twelve numb teeth with them.

In the end, dark field microscopy is a simple method of control for the treatment of many symptoms. It is an indication diagnosis and not an exclusion diagnosis; the theoretical background is compatible with the state-of-the-art which is generally acknowledged today.

Dark field microscopy after blood taking		Dark field microscopy after one hour		Dark field microscopy after four hours		Dark field microscopy after ten hours

Click on image to view!